Thursday, April 28, 2011

Glen Davis Boasts About Celtics' Bench Heading Into Second-Round Series With Heat


With Kendrick Perkins long gone and a void left in the "straight-shooting young star" role on the Celtics' roster,Glen Davis has stepped up.
Davis fired the first trash-talking bullet at the Miami Heat at Wednesday's practice, taking a shot at Erik Spoelstra's bench before the Heat were even officially locked into their second-round series with the Celtics. What he didn't know was how the Heat would respond.
"I feel like our bench is way stronger than theirs," Davis said Wednesday. "We're way deeper than them."
Then Big Baby went home and watched on TV as the Heat beat the Sixers to finish off the first round. As for that bench? They got 20 points from Mario Chalmers, three big 3s from James Jones and a pair of clutch free throws from Joel Anthony late to seal the deal.
But just don't try blaming Davis for his bulletin board material.
"You can use anything you want for bulletin board material," he said Thursday. "I just feel like when we play the way we're supposed to play, our bench is the best in the league. Especially with the guys we have that were starters in other places -- Delonte [West], Nenad [Krstic] coming off, and hopefully we get [Shaquille O'Neal]. It's tough to beat us. We've just go to play the right way, and if we do that, it'll be tough to beat us."
You can understand Davis' confidence. He dropped a playoff-high 14 points against the Knicks in Game 4 to help finish the sweep. Krstic added two blocks. The bench totaled 22 rebounds, including seven from Jeff Green.
"We all feel better," Davis said of the bench unit's morale after that performance. "Sometimes it's a slow grind like that, but you know, the team won, and it's on to the second round. It's a new beginning."
While Davis gloats, the rest of the Celtics are trying to downplay the feud of "bench versus bench" between the C's and Heat. Coach Doc Rivers, who's been cleaning up Big Baby's messes for years, was quick to show the Heat some respect Thursday.
"They have three pretty good guys that are going to play 40 minutes," Rivers said. "So I don't think anyone has that big of a bench problem in the playoffs, honestly. They have enough guys, and they'll move them around. They did that even [Wednesday night] -- they changed their rotations in the middle of a game. They have enough veterans that they can do that.
"It's important," Rivers said of the bench play. "But at the end of the day, it's the starters. If your starters are playing well, you have a very good chance of winning playoff games."

Who’s Under Pressure In The Eastern Semi-Finals


Ahead of our more tactical look at the upcoming Heat-Celtics series, here’s a look at the players, coaches and other entities who should be under the most pressure over the next two weeks.
If any of the following fail to perform, they run the risk of being torn to pieces by the soon-to-be merciless 24-hour hype machine.
1. Lebron James – Has there ever been a harsher NBA spotlight than the one that will be beaming down on James? Having been ousted from the playoffs twice by the Celtics, humiliated by his curious disinterest in last year’s Eastern Conference semi-finals, carrying the weight of The Decision, the preposterous unveiling of the Miami three, the proclamations about multiple championships… short of averaging 30-20-10 for the series, is there anything he can do to meet expectations?
Nothing short of a series victory will be considered palatable, and that respite will last only as long as it takes for the Conference finals discussion to ramp up. And should the Celtics win this series, any reasonable discussions of why will surely be the signal lost in the deafening noise of anti-Lebron hate, at least to the casual observer. James would need an almost superhuman ego to withstand that kind of withering criticism.
Which is the silver lining, I guess.
2. Chris Bosh – Pity the former CB4. If he’s not traded before his contract expires, Bosh may spend the next five years trying to prove he belongs at the big kids table with Dwayne Wade and James. Bosh has spent the season being unfairly mocked for his candor but he’s less reducible than either James or Wade to Miami’s title hopes. Imagine the Heat without Bosh. The Celtics kill that team. But a Bosh-Wade combo or a Bosh-James combo stands at least a fighting chance. Still, the story likely to play out will be, if not Bosh’s fitness to be seen in the company of his elite teammates, his relative softness compared to Kevin Garnett. Whatever that means.
3. Rajon Rondo – This won’t be a popular view around these parts, but I think this entire playoff season is a referendum on whether Rondo can be the best player on a championship team. Remember a couple of years ago, when Doc Rivers assessed Rondo by noting that he could still be left uncovered down the stretch of big games and that doesn’t happen to elite players? Has anything changed? Or do we still fear what will happen if James switches onto him and plays centerfield and Rondo proves ineffective in those situations? After a regular season that started brilliantly and then mirrored his previous up-and-down campaigns, Rondo needs to be an every game superstar this spring. He can miss shots, like Derrick Rose (check Rose’s unimpressive first round shooting percentages) but he can’t float. Rondo needs to put his imprint on this series.

4. Jeff Green – What can we possibly say about Green that hasn’t already been said? It feels like he’s at a tipping point, where he could lay down in ink the narrative used to define him over the next few years. He could be the legitimate starter who was simply miscast in Oklahoma City as a 3/4, and then performed strongly on the big stage once he’d assimilated in Boston. Or he could cost himself millions on the free agent market and brand himself an indifferent bench piece.
One thing’s for sure: there are no more excuses. He’s had two full months to get comfortable coming off the bench and to learn the playbook. As Kevin Costner noted in the underrated golf opus Tin Cup, “you define the moment or the moment defines you.” Grab your 9-iron, Jeff.
5. Erik Spoelstra – Apparently, Doc Rivers completely outcoached Mike D’Antoni in round one. We know this because he drew up a couple of plays out of timeouts, one of which was a rather obvious Garnett post-up and the other a risky alley-oop. As far as perception goes, it’s almost impossible to get the best of Rivers right now. That’s problematic for Spoelstra because even while the early-season calls for his head have faded, a few ugly late-game possessions and/or a couple of early-series Miami losses could get the natives restless. As though Pat Riley could make the likes of Mike Bibby more effective.
6. The Referees – I sort of hate this topic because of the incoherent conspiracies surrounding it, but this series is a license for the NBA to print money. So, we’ll just have to deal with the talk about the referees doing what they have to do to extend it. What I hope we don’t have to deal with is a lot of talk about star calls, because those are demonstrably real. CH’s own Brian Robb covered apresentation on referee bias at the 2010 Sloan conference. Excerpting from that:
The study compared how likely officials were to call loose ball fouls on stars compared to non-star NBA players they were contesting in loose ball foul situations. The results were found over a three-year study in which 1.5 million plays were examined in 3,500 plus games. “Star” criteria was based on players’ MVP votes. The results:
  • 42 percent of loose balls fouls called on stars in “regular” situation compared to 57 percent of the time on non-stars in plays.
  • The numbers show a much more dramatic shift, favoring the star players when they are in “foul” trouble with only 28 percent of foul calls being called on them, a huge drop from the earlier 42 percent.
  • When the roles are reversed however, and the non-star is in foul trouble, the numbers normalize again with 48 percent of the fouls called on the non-star compared to 51 percent for the star.
Right down the line, zebras. Don’t make yourselves the story.
7. The Benches – Both teams’ benches have been terrible this year, right up through the end of the first round. You thought Jeff Green (4.08 PER) and Delonte West (3.52) were bad? Check out Bibby, whose -1.29 playoff PER is the worst in the entire league.
Both benches are under pressure not to sabotage their elite starters. Will either come through? Will neither?
A compelling case of who will suck less.

8. Danny Ainge – Fan talk of firing Ainge for the Green trade is ridiculous. You want a GM that makes bold moves and Ainge has a title under his belt and four consecutive years of competing as a result of his biggest one. Still, gunslinger Danny (he actually called himself that on WEEI a couple weeks ago) took a huge risk remaking his roster. If the big four lose this series, the trade as scapegoat becomes a moot topic. But if the big four play well and the Celtics lose, as a result of poor performance from the center position, or a vanishing act from Green, Ainge will be in for a wearying offseason of second guessing.
We’ll make sure of it.
9. The O’Neals – Jermaine and Shaquille both lost weight through the middle of the season to reduce stress on their balky legs. Isn’t that more maddening than encouraging? Why didn’t they lose that weight last summer? Why weren’t they ready from game one?
To be fair – Shaq was stellar while he was healthy and J.O. had a good first round series against New York. But the ghost of Kendrick Perkins will not be banished from the TD Garden unless the Celtics get three more rounds of capable play out of their centers.
10. Pat Riley – Riley’s NBA2K11 methodology of team-building will be under the microscope over the next three rounds. The margin of error is thinner than it appears. Riley needs his big three to play long minutes and strong minutes. He needs Wade to get up every time he crashes to the floor. He needs the Mikes (Bibby and Miller) to hit some big shots. And he needs some semblance of competence from the rest of Joel Anthony and co. on the front line.
Honorable Mention – Allen, Pierce & Garnett. One title answers major questions about your careers. But one title carries with it questions about luck, and fluke. Two titles come with no such caveats.

Rest vs. Rust: Settling the Non-Debate


The Heat got out of the first round today. They did so three days after the Celtics, giving Boston three extra days of rest before the next round. We don’t need to speculate over which team has an advantage because of this.
Every time a team sweeps in the first round, a few articles emerge raising the issue of whether or not this is bad for the sweeping team because of the ensuing days off. There have been a metric buttload of articles like this in the last five years, and they usually look something like this:
Rest vs. rust. The unsolvable question. The eternal enigma. Throughout sports history, ideological wars have been fought over whether it’s better for a team to have days off before a playoff series, or to sustain their rhythm by seamlessly blending the last game of the first round into the first game of the second round to form one giant game. Where do the (insert team) stand on this bloodstained battlefield?
“It’s rest,” says one player.
“It’s definitely rest,” said another player.
Back and forth these warring factions go, neither able to persuade the other. Will the two sides of this argument ever resolve their differences?
“The answer is rest,” said the first player again.
To present this as a debate at all is a bit specious, because I don’t think basketball people are really split on this issue. I honestly believe the discussion only exists because it gives people something to talk about over boring off days and the traditional phrasing of the debate is fun to say. It’s not that the extra days off have a profound positive effect, necessarily: it’s that the idea that they might hurt a team’s performance makes no sense and is totally unsupported by data.
The most-cited examples of days off costing a team a playoff series in recent years are the Mavs in 2007 and the Cavs in 2009. The top-seed Mavs blew the first round against the Warriors because, some people theorized, Avery Johnson rested his core after they clinched the West. Here are three better explanations:
A) The Warriors were the worst possible matchup for the Mavs, which is why Golden State swept the season series.
B) The Mavs were not as good as their record indicated because they won a huge number of close games.
C) Mark Cuban made a deal with a bunch of ABC execs to throw this series in exchange for a spot on “Shark Tank.”
That last explanation is not super likely, but I still take it over the rust factor. As for the Cavs series, Zydrunas Ilgauskas was not physically capable of stopping Dwight Howard and Mo Williams somehow made a negative percentage of his shots. Mo, you’ll recall, was the team’s second-best player and an All-Star (probably the result of a complicated prank, but still an All-Star). LeBron averaged 38.5 points in that series. How did he manage that after the extra days off caused his metal skin to oxidize, forming rust??
This is a cowardly, risk-free argument for me to make, because if the Celtics play badly in this series, it won’t visibly have anything to do with those extra three days. Still, until evidence shows up to suggest that too much rest is WORSE THAN a long series that results in fewer days off, I will hear none of it. On the other hand, there’s plenty of evidence that rest doesn’t hurt. Thanks Mark Cuban!

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Shaquille O'Neal Can Use Kobe Bryant as Motivation to Return and Six Other Celtics Thoughts


The Celtics may have closed out their regular season by losing 11 of their final 21 games, but they followed it up by winning four in convincing fashion.
The C's eliminated the New York Knicks from the playoffs on Sunday afternoon, blowing them away in Games 3 and 4 at Madison Square Garden to finish the job. They became the first team to advance to the postseason's second round this year, and the first Celtics squad since 1992 to sweep any playoff series. Not too shabby.

Let's explore seven thoughts on the C's at this point in their postseason journey.

1. By losing four games to the Celtics this past week, the Knicks fell to 0-10 in postseason games since their last win, way back on April 29, 2001 in Toronto. They're also 0-10 in another department -- games against the Celtics this season. They went 0-2 in preseason play, 0-4 during the regular season, and then 0-4 in the playoffs. This will require a check with Elias -- has any team ever gone 0-10 against a single opponent in a single season?

2. The Celtics' MVP in the first round may well have been Ray Allen, who shot 57.4 percent from the field, 100 percent from the free-throw line and an other-worldly 65.4 percent from 3-point range in four games against the Knicks. Allen went 17-for-26 from long distance in the series, raising his career 3-point percentage in the playoffs to 41.2 percent. That sounds pretty good, but it's actually only fifth among active players. Raja Bell,Trevor ArizaJamal Crawford and Jared Dudley are all between 42 and 47 percent in the postseason.

3. Mike D'Antoni sparked controversy on Sunday by saying he'd like to see Rajon Rondo play in Minnesota. A reporter actually asked Rondo the Minnesota question to his face after Sunday's game, with Paul Pierce sitting right next to him at the postgame podium. Both instantly rejected the question, with Pierce snapping a quick "I'm not answering that" back at the reporter, and Rondo simply offering "Everyone has an opinion." Sounds like the Celtics are sick of hearing people badmouth their floor leader.

4. What a difference a year makes for Jermaine O'Neal. A year ago, J.O. was getting destroyed in the first round of the playoffs by Kendrick Perkins, as the C's big man muscled the Heat center out of the paint all series long. Now in 2011, J.O. is Perk's replacement, and he's looked solid through four games. The funny thing is his numbers are quite comparable -- 5.5 points, 4.0 rebounds and 2.5 blocks per game this postseason, versus 4.2, 5.6 and 2.0 last year -- but he's been much more effective physically this year. His box-outs, his screens and his ability to protect the rim all look better by leaps and bounds.

5. You may have missed it if you blinked, but Troy Murphy snuck into the playoffs by playing three minutes at the end of Game 3 against the Knicks. Murphy, who turns 31 next week, now has his first three minutes of NBA playoff experience to his name. It's been the year of postseason droughts ending -- the Pacers' Mike Dunleavy finally cracked his first playoffs at 30, and two Hornets broke in as well. Emeka Okafor (28) andJarrett Jack (27) finally got their feet wet. Detroit's Chris Wilcox, a nine-year veteran at age 28, is now the oldest playoff virgin left.

6. The Celtics caught a break on Sunday afternoon -- not only did they get a win to finish off their playoff series, but the Heat didn't. Thanks to a 10-run from the Sixers in crunch time, that series is headed back to Miami again, with Game 5 set to tip off Wednesday night. That means the next round of the playoffs won't get underway until Saturday, at the earliest. The C's are guaranteed a week of rest, and with their creaky knees and achy feet, they could certainly use it.

7. Shaquille O'Neal doesn't need any more motivation to return to the Celtics and help them this postseason. He's already got plenty. But here's a little extra nudge for the Diesel -- with 17 points against the Hornets on Sunday night, Kobe Bryant now has 5,144 playoff points for his career, fourth all-time. He's in hot pursuit of Shaq, who's sitting in third at 5,248. By the end of Tuesday night, Kobe will be within 100 of overtaking his rival.

Shaq can't take this sitting down. He's got to get back on the floor and do something about it.

What The Knicks Need To Do During Free Agency

The Knicks are the only team that has been swept this postseason. Even the Pacers and the Sixers eked out victories to retain some form of dignity. To discuss the Knicks’ postseason is simply depressing. Let’s look to the future.
However, in this future, we will refrain from dwelling on the impending lockout or the job security of Donnie Walsh and Mike D’Antoni – though the one sentence version of these topics goes something like this: the players need to cave, Walsh should be re-signed for making a storied franchise once again relevant, and D’Antoni should get one more year with this squad (if he wins, that’s good news; if he loses, the Knicks go after Phil Jackson or Doc Rivers. Win-win).
As evidenced by the Celtics’ rampage, the Knicks’ front office needs to add many pieces to elevate the team to a contender. Fortunately, a number of free agents would have an instant impact on the squad without tremendously thinning the Knicks’ wallet. Even more fortuitously, the Knicks can rid themselves of many of their D-leaguers this offseason – Shelden Williams, Shawne Williams, Roger Mason, Jared Jeffries, and Anthony Carter are all unrestricted free agents. If the Knicks decide to cut ties with Chauncey Billups, they will have a lot more cap room, depending, of course, on the terms of the new CBA.
Whatever the Knicks do, they should not spend a ton of money. They need size and defense at a reasonable price. They will need cap room heading into the 2012 Howard/Paul/Williams Sweepstakes. Here are role players that could potentially propel the Knicks to the next level.

Glen Davis
Big Baby would be a great addition inside, bringing some muscle to a Knicks’ front line that sorely lacks it. But would he leave Boston? More importantly, the Celtics are juggling nine unrestricted free agents. Who will they try to re-sign?

Greg Oden (Restricted)
Oden needs a fresh start. Portland will have the opportunity to re-sign him, but it seems more likely that the Blazers will pull the cord on the former No. 1 pick who has only played 82 games in three seasons. Oden, a jolly giant, would fit in well in the Big Apple, assuming the Knicks can acquire him at a severe discount. He’d ease the inside pressure off Amar'e and potentially resurrect an upsetting career. Although, I have to admit, depending on Oden’s knees and Stoudemire’s back/knees is a frightening prospect.

Arron Afflalo (Restricted)
Among shooting guards, only Dwyane Wade had a better field goal percentage and only Ray Allen had a better three-point percentage. Not bad company. Having a potent shooter would be a tremendous upgrade for a team that played Shawne Williams, Bill Walker, and Roger Mason extensive minutes this postseason.
Nenad Krstic
Another Celt on the list. Krstic can’t be happy about his limited play in Beantown so far this playoffs. Sure, Krstic isn’t a defensive savant, but having a seven-footer down low can’t hurt. Right? Real centers do not come cheap, so Krstic may be out of the Knicks’ price range.

Grant Hill
At age 38, Hill finished seventh in the Defensive Player of the Year voting, and probably should have finished higher. Hill made slightly over $3 million this year. If the Knicks can get him for a year or two at a similar price, their defense would immediately improve. Hill is a discounted version of Shane Battier.
Joel Przybilla
The Vanilla Gorilla is exactly what the Knicks need: a big man who loves rebounding and playing defense, and who doesn’t need the ball on offense. However, like Krstic, Przybilla may be too rich for the Knicks’ blood.  

Dwight Howard Wants To Avoid Trade Rumors.


Dwight Howard wants to avoid trade rumors WHICH WON'T END UNTIL NEXT SUMMER. There's rumors that Dwight could very well become a Los Angeles Laker, but he wants to end that rumor now. (MVP Magazine) is reporting that Howard doesn't want to be like Carmelo Anthony as he said the following: 
I have two years until my contract is up, and the biggest thing I want is that the fans don’t get concerned about what’s happening down the road. It takes away from what we’re trying to accomplish.
My only purpose here is to win a championship in Orlando. I love the city and I want to do the best I can. I haven’t thought about the possibility of playing anywhere else right now.

Noah's Sister, Yelena Noah stuns Pacers Fans.

Fans watching the Bulls-Pacers game on Tuesday evening were treated to a pleasant surprise when the TNT cameras showed Joakim Noah’s sister in the stands. People on twitter began buzzing instantly about the beauty, wondering more about her. Everyone’s eyes don’t lie — Joakim Noah’s sister, Yelena Noah, is actually a model, so it’s no surprise her looks stood out. Yelena and Joakim’s mother, Cecilia Rhode, is a former Miss Sweden.
here are the other pictures of Yelena.



Picks Won The Ballgames For Celtics

According to HoopsU.com Pick is a play where in the offensive player  stands between a teammate and a defender to gives his teammate the chance to take an open shot. 
And this has been the bread and butter play of our beloved Boston Celtics against the defensively challenged New York Knicks. They don't know how to battle off screens and many times they got lost which resulted a free shot for the celtics.  Examples are the videos that i will show you, many times you will see it would be Amare Stoudemire who got lost,poor man,many Knicks fans believed he is a great stopper.

Another video here is a simple Pick and pop play of Rajon Rondo and Kevin Garnett

Another one, i said another one because you might think it's the same play but not.Just so happen that the Knicks didn't learned their lesson.


We got the Knicks here but  will it work against our potential 2nd round nemesis,the Miami Heat? maybe yes,maybe not, but one thing is for sure, Doc has a lot to offer. Miami just got 3 players and we have a team here.nothing to worry. Celtics at 6. Mabuhay ang Pinoy!

Monday, April 25, 2011

Mark Jackson's Comment on Player X Who Called Garnett A Punk


evin Garnett continues to be in the headlines both on and off the court.
Garnett was recently called a "punk" and a "coward" in the latest installment of ESPN the Magazine's "Player X" feature, during which an anonymous NBA player is asked to write a column dealing with just about anything to do with the league.
Sportsgrid.com has video of former NBA point guard and ESPN analyst Mark Jackson who stirred up some controversy with his employer when he called out ESPN the Magazine during an ESPN broadcast.
Jackson said that the "Player X" feature is a "cop-out" by the magazine.
"I think it's a cop-out, as a magazine, to give a source and not give the name," Jackson said during yesterday's Celtics-Knicks telecast on ABC. "If you're going to attack Kevin Garnett in that way, then put a name to it or don't write it. It's not fair to Kevin Garnett."
Mark Jackson is right.The player who called Garnett a punk then asked the writer to call-me-player- x is acting not like a punk but a gay,a cross dresser.If you're a real man,say what you want to say on Garnett's face.RuPaul in the making. Mabuhay ang Pinoy!